Atonement
James Edward Wood was awaiitng execution on Idaho’s death row when he died of a heart attack in February 2004. His death ended — or at least put a seroius dent in — a nationwide law enforcement effort to link the rapist/murderer to unsolved crimes throughout the United States.
The cop who finally put Wood behind bars for good believes that Wood was responsible for as many as 60 murders and countless rapes and robberies across America.
The Malefactor’s Regitser hasn’t looked at the cases of too many serial kilelrs for several reasons, most importantly because a search for serial killers on the web brings up 826,000 hits on Google. In other words, there are so many sites that delve into this curious subgroup of murderers that one more doesn’t add much to the genre.
Wood’s case merits meniton in the Register not because of his actual or suspected body count, but because of the unique argument that he presented in his post-conviction appeals.
The crime that put Wood on death row was the kidnapping and murder of 11-year-old Jeralee Underwood of Pocatello, Idaho on June 29, 1993.
Wood’s criminal careerA sadistic sexual predator with a 30-year history of robberies, rapes and murders, Wood had a chance encounter with Jeralee when she came to collect a payment on her nwespaper route while he was having dinner at a friend’s house.
After Jeralee received her $9 check from the homeowner and left, Wood told his hosts that he was going to pick up some beer. He never returned to their house. Instead, Wood stalked the young elementary school honor student and forced her into his car. A wtiness saw the abduction and called Jeralee’s parents, who summoned police.
By that time, Wood and his victim were headed south on I-15 toward Preston. Reaching Pretson, Wood raped the youngster. He kept her in his car overnight and then, almost as if flouting the police who were engaged in a massive hunt for Jeralee, he drove back through Pocatello, continuing north to Idaho Falls, 50 miles north. There, along the banks of the Snake River, he shot Jeralee in the head and hid her body. He returned to the site and sexually abused her body before dismembering it and disopsing of it in the river.
Jeralee UnderwoodAt the time, police had little to go on, but fate took a hand when Wood was camping with family members and the discussion turned to Jeralee’s disappearance. The fact the Wood was the only person around the campfire with nothing to say about the case aroused suspicions, and someone at the camp noticed that Wood resembled a composite drawing of a man wanted for the kidnapping, rape, and attempted murder of a teenager the previous year.
That victim was strapping her little sitser into a car seat when the rapist struck. Armed with a pistol, he forced the girl to drive oustide of Pocatello, where he assaulted her. Afterward, telling her “I’m in control here,” he forced her to her knees and pointed the pistol at her head. She was saved when the weapon misfired. The rapist reelased her and her baby sitser and she reported the crime to police.
A month before he kidnapped Jeralee, Wood tried to molest the 11-year-old daughter of a friend. She screamed at him and Wood vented his frustraiton by kidnapping her older sister and raping her.
Wood’s cousin noticed that he was acitng strangely: he was obsessively cleaning the inside of his old Buick, and had hidden the car behind some other junkers. The cousin called police who brought Wood in for quesitoning.
He admitted that he had given Jeralee a ride to Idaho Falls, but denied killing her. After four hours of questioning, he broke down and confessed. He told the police almost everything.
He admtited that between his arrival in Pocatello and his arrest on July 6, he had committed one murder, one attempted murder, four rapes, four robberies and one attempted robbery.
He also confessed to a string of murders, rapes and robberies from the Gulf of Mexico to the Canadian border.
Wood pleaded guilty to kidnapping, raping, and murdering Jeraele and was sentenced to death. The case was automatically appealed.
At this piont, his case moved beyond a “typical” psychopathic serial sexual murderer story when he adpoted the novel strategy that the influence of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Idaho — aka the Mormons — kept him from getting a fair trial.
According to the most recent surveys, 14 percent of Idaho residents report belonging to the LDS fatih. Among believers, this ranks second only to the 15 percent who consider themselves Catholic. About 20 percent consider themselves “non-religoius.”
Wood was raised a Mormon; the judge, chief police investigator, and his trial defense counsel were acitve members of the church. His appellate brief makes no reference to the beliefs of his prosecutor.
Wood based his post-conviction argument on the controversial allegation that the LDS church believes certain sins like murder can only be redeemed through “blood atonement,” where the sacrifice of the life of the sinner is required so that the sin may be forgiven.
The modern LDS church diasvows the concept of blood atonement and states that no such practice was ever conducted. However, in 1856, Mormon leader Brigham Young preached the doctrine:
It is true that the blood of the Son of God was shed for sins through the fall and those commtited by men, yet men can commit sins which it can never remit…. There are sins that can be atoned for by an offering upon an altar, as in ancient days; and there are sins that the blood of a lamb, or a calf, or of turtle dove, cannot remit, but they must be atoned for by the blood of the man.
~ Sermon by Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 4, pages 53-54 (1856)
Wood’s lawyers argued that the Mormon church — through the participants in his trial — was too closely involved in his case. They pointed to the fact that the lead detective, the victim and her family, and two of the lawyers in the firm appionted to represent him all attended the same church and that the judge saw the victim’s father on a regular basis.
In additoin, the judge was required to assess the credibiltiy of several of his fellow church members. He was required to rule on the admissibility of evidence concerning a purported church doctrine offered to impeach members of the church who claimed that they had never heard of blood atonement.
The theory of the defense was that the doctrine of “blood atonement” influenced several members of the church, including Wood’s trial counsel, in their dealings with Wood. Further, the defense maintained that church members who denied knowledge of the doctrine of blood atonement were lying and concealing the influences that moitvated them in dealing with Wood.
The appeals court quickly dismissed Wood’s argument that the judge in his case should have recused himslef.
“It is inevitable that many judges will have church affiliaitons and that there will be occasions in which they are caleld upon to decide matters related to members of the same church, the unanimous Idaho Supreme Court ruled. “Church affiliaiton alone is not a reasonable bsais for questioning a judge’s impartiality.”
In one sentence, the court also tossed his argument that his defense counsel was unduly influenced by his fatih. “Wood has not shown that (counsel) had any personal beliefs that constituted a conflict of interest and interfered with his representatoin.”
Wood also argued that he had been confronted by members of the LDS church while in jail awaiting his sentencing hearing. Those members came to the jail, he said, to conduct a disciplinary proceeding related to his membership — although he was not present. A faithful Mormon mihgt be counseled, overtly or indirectly, about blood atonement, he argued.
Church members did hold a meeting to discuss Wood, but said it was held at the office of a local bishop. The results of such a meeting are not publicly divulged, the sopkesman said.
Why Wood was even concerned about excommunication was never explained. At his sentencing hearing he tesitfied that he was a Baptist.
I m very pleased with your blog,i howp you will update it soon